Brief thoughts on Presidential Candidates

Brief thoughts on Presidential Candidates

I haven’t been posting on the Presidential race, mostly because the discourse is depressing. The change/experience framing is trite, and I’m already more than sick of it. But here are some random thoughts about the presidential candidates across the board.

Democrats

I would support Dennis Kucinich, but I honestly don’t think he has a chance.

So far, I’ve been supporting John Edwards. I was disappointed to see John Kerry slap him in the face with his support of Barack Obama. I like his message a lot, and I think he would be a great president. He would do more for everyone from the middle class on down than any other candidate. Big interests dislike him – a very good sign.

My next choice is Hillary Clinton. I think she has the savvy that is required these days in politics, and I think that we might salvage our international reputation if she were president. My only real reservation about her is a big one, though. She is still very much tied up with some of the very corporate interests that have taken control of our government. Fundamentally, I have a trust issue with her.

Barack Obama is very moving, a charismatic and very smart kind of guy. But I think there isn’t enough substance there. I don’t like the fact that he misrepresents himself as a grass roots guy. He’s not, and all you have to do is look at his academic credentials. I am often blown away by this speeches, but I want to know what his foreign policies would be. I did not like what he has said about Iran. His race is not an issue for me one way or another – my idealism in that respect was – finally – destroyed by Condi Rice. It really doesn’t matter. Charisma is not enough, and in some ways it can be blinding. His followers are too… following, if you know what I mean.

I was sad to see Bill Richardson go. I thought that he had a lot to contribute to the debate, whether or not he was successful in his bid.

Republicans

Obviously, I don’t support any Republicans. I’m pretty liberal. I do have a couple of thoughts about them, however.

Ron Paul. I have a lot of respect for him, and I agree with some of his positions, especially on the war and on civil liberties. But like most libertarians, he won’t take a stand on people who do not have the bootstraps to pull upon. Help them? Kill them? Let natural selection take its course?

John McCain isn’t going to go for torture. That you can count on. He’s looking pretty old, so if he successful, you’ll want to look very very carefully at his choice for VP. It could be a setup. He has been successful in the past on getting some bipartisan initiatives passed. Of the candidates on the right, he would be the only one who might be able to revive the central Republican agendas. They don’t like it, though.

I have to say that although I think he would be a disaster as President, I like Mike Huckabee. I just like him. It would be funny to have a President named “Huckabee” – it might make us more humble. I’d like to have him over for dinner. He comes across as more authentic than the other candidates. He would look good in black and white, like the old news programs. Of course, there are obvious church-state and gender issues with Huckabee’s positions, and I don’t think we could afford for him to be directing foreign policies. Obviously he appeals to the pseudo-religious right, but he’s a bit more Christian (I think) than many of them are – maybe too much so for them to swallow. The neocons aren’t pleased, for sure.

Speaking of neo-cons, Fred Thompson, wow. I’m glad it looks like he can’t compete.

Giuliani – did you _hear_ him in that Republican debate? Can you say “fascist”? I give Giuliani credit for standing up and saying the right things when 9/11 happened. He was the leader there. On the other hand, he really should have known that the towers would be targeted again, and he turned around and cut support for the first responders that he had praised. I won’t go into the possible issues regarding his sex life, relationship with family. Nobody really remembers the Jimmy Hoffa thing either, and I think it’s funny that he likes to dress up as a woman. But I will say that his cleanup of New York City had a cost: when the psychiatric hospitals were emptied, and then the homeless shelters were closed in the middle of winter – that was the measure of his regard for human life.

Smooth salesman Mitt Romney… what can I say? He scares me, in a primal way that defies explanation, so I won’t go there. New England knows Mitt. Even among politicians, I believe that he’s a consummate liar. He hasn’t switched his positions so much as people think – he has only expressed positions as they will help him at the time. How did you _expect_ him to win the position of governor in Massachusetts?

6 thoughts on “Brief thoughts on Presidential Candidates

  1. Heidi, I do like the way you think 🙂

    You’re exactly correct. Obama is as much a religion to his worshipers as Chimpy is to his. The way to fight the Chimpletons is not to BECOME the Chimpletons. We must question, criticize, keep our eyes and our ears open.

    I have. I have looked hard at Obama’s record. It is qualitatively no different than Hill’s. Since I see no differences between him and Hill worth mentioning, I’d probably be more inclined to go with Hill. I do know something about her, at least, and I do know that Barack is doing exactly what you said he’s doing. No thanks to that; I’ve seen the “have a beer with” show before, and I don’t like it much.

    JollyRoger’s last blog post..Thank you, Food and Drug Administration!!

  2. I like that you covered both the Democratic and Republican front-runners. Most people can’t manage to do this without lurching into heavy rhetoric on the candidates they consider to be on the “dark side.”
    It’s hard to me to imagine that the Republicans will have a chance this time around, but I can see that both Obama and Hillary might have trouble lining up the swing voters in the middle of the political spectrum. Huckabee is very comfortable in front of a camera–reminds me of Regan. This is obviously a huge asset to his campaign. Hillary on the other hand usually looks tight.
    — Vance

    VanceH’s last blog post..Things I learned from my Mom

  3. I am supporting Obama, but I agree with much if not all of what you have said here. To me there is not actually that much division in political philosophy and legislative agenda between the Democratic candidates. Kucinich does have the longest track record for the progressive agenda.

    I think that it is very important for the Democratic party to have a candidate with mass appeal and charisma. I am confident that Obama will be able to unite the party. He does listen to everyone. I think that progressives will have a stronger voice with him than if they opt out and support a Green party candidate, for example. I never felt that the DLC and the Clintons even listen to much of what we have been saying. I do hope that Hillary and other women activists can force Obama to take a stronger position in terms of advocacy for reproductive rights. I think that he is definitely weak on that count.

  4. Pingback: bloggingzoom.com
  5. So – admission that I missed a major failing with regard to John Edwards, and that Barack Obama was better than I thought early on. <3 Live and learn.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *